False Equivalency on Obama-Wright [Updated]
Bill Moyers weighs in on the Obama-Wright controversy and, as usual, forgets to take of his ideological blinders.
I once asked a reporter back from Vietnam: “Who’s telling the truth over there?”
“Everyone,” he said. “Everyone sees what’s happening through the lens of their own experience.”
That’s how people see Jeremiah Wright.
In my conversation with him and in his dramatic public appearances since, he revealed himself to be far more complex than the sound bites that propelled him onto the public stage.
Apparently, like John Kerry, the voters just aren’t smart enough to understand Reverend Wright. But that’s not really my point, or Bill’s.
Behold the double standard: John McCain sought out the endorsement of John Hagee, the war-mongering, Catholic-bashing Texas preacher, who said the people of New Orleans got what they deserved for their sins.
But no one suggests McCain shares Hagee’s delusions or thinks AIDS is God’s punishment for homosexuality. Pat Robertson called for the assassination of a foreign head of state and asked God to remove Supreme Court justices, yet he remains a force in the Republican religious right.
After 9/11, Jerry Falwell said the attack was God’s judgment on America for having been driven out of our schools and the public square, but when McCain goes after the endorsement of the preacher he once condemned as an agent of intolerance, the press gives him a pass.
…
This is crazy and wrong — white preachers are given leeway in politics that others aren’t.Which means it is all about race, isn’t it?
No, it doesn’t.
When John McCain goes knocking on the doorstep of Hagee, Falwell or Robertson, it’s because McCain’s a politician beating the bushes for the hearts and minds of voters. Had Obama gone to Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton in search of endorsements, the partisans would have cried foul, but the voters and the media wouldn’t have cared. But Obama didn’t go knocking on Wright’s door for votes. Obama sat in Wright’s pulpit to drink in his message for more than two decades. There’s a difference there.
Jesus said to Peter, “Feed my sheep.” And since Obama spent most of his adult life grazing at Reverend Wright’s feet, the voters have every right to examine what’s in the grass.
[Update] Frank Rich is trying the same trick in the NYT.
Trackposted to Rosemary’s Thoughts, third world county, Faultline USA, Nuke Gingrich, McCain Blogs, 123beta, Shadowscope, Pirate’s Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Cao’s Blog, , Democrat=Socialist, , and Right Voices, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.


Get the Yankee Sage delivered!
Bio: I am currently a Professor of Security Studies, hold a BS in Management and an MA in National Security Studies, and am pursuing an MA in Systematic and Philosophical Theology. I've written for Navy Times, Proceedings, Armed Forces Journal and a number of blogs. As a 24-year veteran of the U.S. Navy and Navy Reserve, I attained the rank of Commander, deployed five times for four different conflicts and served as a Foreign Area Officer and a Surface Warfare Officer. During my 7 years in the private sector, I worked in the fields of information technology and publishing, and even ran for public office once.





May 4th, 2008 at 18:48
My, my. People seem to lose their minds when election time rolls around. Well, the Left does it more frequently, but many do it during the election cycle. Did you notice, or am I the only one, that this election has been running since 2004? No wonder everyone is sick of it! lol. Nice to see you have some opinions in ya. Whether I agree or not, doesn’t really matter. You’re Navy, so you’re alright with me.
May 4th, 2008 at 22:46
I have noticed the campaign has been going on forever. Fortunately I was living in Japan and insulated from it for two years.
May 4th, 2008 at 23:04
I disagree.
Obama is the political Soapy Smith of the twenty-first century, complete with fainting confederates in the crowd.
The truth is, that on the basis of his background and his comments to audiences in venues where he’s felt comfortable, it’s very doubtful that Obama has any religion at all, except perhaps the religion of opportunism. So in a sense he did go to Wright looking for an endorsement, and yes, votes. This isn’t dminished by the fact that it was done indirectly; if anything this amplifies the immorality of it.
In his Senate voting record and the “breathtaking” speech in Philadelphia, which trashed Reaganism as inauthentic and racist in the tortured code of postmodernism, the nebulous mist of the “new politician” starts to clear and the outline of a tediously old-school liberal takes form. Obama’s associations–the ones we know at least–reinforce the stereotype of a typical “progressive,” now frantically distancing himself from his own fake identity for the sake of the next Big Con. Unfortunately for Soapy, Wright, Ayers, and the other chickens he used to feather his nest and establish his leftist bona fides have come home to roost.
May 4th, 2008 at 23:36
Actually, I tend to agree with you that Obama is an empty suit when it come to faith. Personally I think his wife picked the church and he just went along, which is so often the case when it comes to church attendance.
The problem is, Obama’s made too many very clear statements about the influence of Wright in his spiritual life to effectively disown the guy now.